10 Prehistoric Battles That Could (and Probably Did) Happen

Societal Barriers in Robert Frosts Poem The Mending Wall...

Societal Barriers in Robert Frosts Poem The Mending Wall The Mending Wall by Robert Frost is one of the poems in his collection that he wrote after his encounters with back- country, New England farmers. The poem centers on a wall that separates one neighbor from the other. The introduction to the wall describes the large gaps in need of repair that appear after hunters accidentally shoot the wall while hunting rabbits. The narrator then lets his neighbor know that the wall is in need of repair and they walk with the wall between them in order to view what needs repair. The narrator then notices that the wall is not necessary because his apple trees will never get across to eat the cones under his pines. However, the other†¦show more content†¦The wall is continually rebuilt after it begins to disintegrate which is similar to the way old prejudices and segregations reappear after it seems that progress has been made to tear down these barriers. The first line of the poem states that nature does not love the wall. This is a strong statement that nature does not promote the way in which society separates itself from one another. Nature does not see differences based upon race, customs, or any social reason for segregation. In Mother Natures view we are all one in the same. The yapping dogs in line 9 represent the cries of society to keep the wall or barrier to separate themselves from what makes them uncomfortable. The fact that the two neighbors meet to talk about the mending of the wall yet do not cross the barrier to meet on common ground, is an example of how people can appear to integrate with each other yet maintain their own invisible barriers. In line 21 Frost compares the mending of the wall to an outdoor game. This is relative to the fact that society continually mends the barrier it maintains yet claims to hold no prejudices or want of separation. This game of pretending to integrate while holding on to invisible barriers is very similar to the building of the wall that separates the two farmers. In line 22 the narrator begins to question the need of this wall. He realizes that he has an apple orchardShow MoreRelatedAnalysis Of The Poem A Picture Is Worth A Thousand Words 1159 Words   |  5 Pagespicture or image that has been provided through words can convey a message, enhancing the reader s comprehension to where a story s main focus is leading. Author s like Robert Frost, William Faulkner, and Susan Glaspell all enrich literary genres through the use of symbolism to reveal the theme to their reader(s); Mending Wall, Barn Burning, and Trifles articulate the central meaning of these works with symbols. Symbolism provides depth beyond anything presented from its primary implication

Heavy Weather At American Airlines Essay Research free essay sample

Heavy Weather At American Airlines Essay, Research Paper Heavy Weather at American Airlines Business Week Heavy Weather at American Jan.27 1997 pg 32 There is a large shingle up at American Airlines. The pilots want more money but direction has already spent it. Another work stoppage you say. Yip, looks like it. The main executive of American Airlines was stunned when on January 8, by an overpowering ballot, pilots rejected a probationary contract. Pilots so got a message from the company president stating # 8220 ; For the first clip in many old ages, we fear for the hereafter of our company. # 8221 ; The ground that this work stoppage could spell catastrophe for one of the taking air hoses in the universe is the instead big order of new aircraft American ordered from Boeing. American says that holding to pay higher pilot wages and purchase new aircraft makes it an wasteful investing, in other words they can non make both and still remain in concern. We will write a custom essay sample on Heavy Weather At American Airlines Essay Research or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page A work stoppage could even endanger a purposed confederation with British Airways. American in non entirely though. With industry net incomes on the changeless rise, employees of other air hoses are forcing for higher wage besides, but undeniably American is in the worst place right now. It looks to me like the pilots were non really happy with the determination to purchase new aircraft from Boeing back in November when it was foremost voted on. It seems as though alternatively of buying new aircraft the pilots wanted a wage addition. What the pilots want is a wage addition of 11 % over the following four old ages. What the have been offered is a 5 % addition. The statement that the pilots have put frontward is the fact that their offer does non even maintain up with rising prices. It looks as though a work stoppage would be really improbable because of the sum of money involved, someplace around 50 million a twenty-four hours would be lost by American. That large of a loss could be really damaging to any company. What can direction make with a quandary like this? It seem that they departed without cognizing where they were traveling to set down. They should hold made sure there would non hold been an rebellion in any portion of the company before the took steps every bit drastic as telling six-billion dollars in new aircraft. It expressions to me like there needs to be better communicating between all aspects of direction in this company. The lone manner out of this muss that I can see is to cut down the order from Boeing so that they can afford to give the pilots at that place cherished wage additions. This could do more jobs depending on how indulgent the contract between Boeing and American is. I # 8217 ; m pretty sure that Boeing would wish to do some money out of the trade excessively. So, I # 8217 ; m wagering that if American wanted to do a smaller order it would likely accommodate both companies better in the long tally. From the employees point of position, it would look like American is sort of a greedy clump. The wage rise that was offered does non even maintain up with current rising prices rates, yet they can warrant passing six-billion on new equipment, when the genuinely do non necessitate to replace it that rapidly. A little graduated table replacing of equipment would likely do everyone much happier. It could acquire pretty messy in the terminal even if the work stoppage ended. If Boeing wants to be greedy about the whole thing, there could be cases affecting rear of barrel of contract and all kinds of ugliness. I # 8217 ; m merely glad that I # 8217 ; m non in charge of cleaning up this muss.

To Know A Fly Essays - The Fly, Fly Fishing, Vincent Dethier, Fly

To Know A Fly Brief Synopsis Mr. Vincent Dethier goes into great detail in describing the flys different aspect of life. The fly is very complex with many human like characteristics. Flies and some people are very much alike in another respect; both prefer what taste good to what is nutritionally best, was stated by the author proving these similar characteristics exist. Many experiments and observations were made through the course of this brook. Such experiments included: testing the flies eating habits, adaptation to their environment, the different purposes of sensor organs, the reasons for hunger, their unique language, exercise patterns involving light, and their brain complexity. He presented the fly in a way that most people couldnt see the power and abilities a fly possesses. Through the course of this book each of these aspects were explained in greater detail with experiments proving many theories and observations. The best definition for an experiment was provided by Dethier as, An experiment is a scientists way of asking nature a question. This would explain many reasons for such a desire people convey to science. Analysis The authors intent was to inform the reader of the misconceptions most common, non-scientist have about the scientific process. He provided a very clear approach to explain his research of the fly to a typical reader. The terminology was very simple and to the point. He stated it best, The scientist who is great is the one who proposes a theory and then attempts to prove or disapprove it rather than the one who proposes a theory and then goes off grinning to greener pastures leaving to onerous job of proof or disproof to others. The author did accomplish his intent to inform the reader of the aspects that a fly possesses. Through many laboratory reports numerous discoveries have been publicized making the world more enriched with scientific knowledge. But throughout all the experiments that were preformed to the flies, one thing remains unique about them. Unlike all other animals and creatures, the fly can not be trained even after 15 years. I found this a very interesting point, bec ause in past experiments, a scientist has proven many ways to train animals to perform premeditated tasks. One instance was described as conditioning, when a scientist trained a dog to salivate to the ring of a bell. But unfortunately, there is not a conditioned response affiliated with the fly. Evaluation The authors purpose of informing the reader was well achieved. I now have a new outlook about the purpose of the fly. Before I read this book, I felt flies didnt have a purpose. They just fly around and become very annoying. But they do serve a purpose, with just as many functions and activities a human possesses. The most important things about flies are they are cheaper and more abundant in our society for scientists that do not have elaborate funds to experiment with. This fact proves very important when the experimenter doesnt know the outcome or effect an experiment has on the tested individual. I was very spectacle about reading a book called, To Know A Fly. But I feel the author did make a good attempt to add humor and situations that the average person could relate to. I did enjoy the way the author presented this information. His style of writing was direct and to the point. This made the reading and understanding of the text relaxing and enjoyable. I would not recommend this book to friends, but I would recommend it to fellow classmates interested in experimental sciences. I feel that Professor Gordon picked an excellent book to portray the lifestyles and misconceptions of scientists. I have gained a wide variety of information about the lifestyle and adaptation process a fly creates in his or her environment. Vincent Dethier said it best; To know the fly is to share a bit in the sublimity of knowledge. That is the challenge and the joy of science. In this statement, the purpose of this book is summed into two sentences. All humans have a desire to know and learn; proving science is an ideal subject that everyone has used. Its just a matter of how you use it. Science Essays

The Arms Race, a History of Weapons

The Arms Race, a History of Weapons Free Online Research Papers The USSR and the US maintained an alliance through WWII, until the US produced the atomic bomb, a weapon of mass destruction and symbol of world domination. The Manhattan Project was held top-secret from 1942-1945, until the US uncovered a Soviet Union spy feeding top-secret atomic information back to the USSR (â€Å"Manhattan Project†). The Americans achieved the development of the atomic bomb before anyone on May 8, 1945. At the end of WWII, the Soviet Union sent a telegram to the US explaining the hostility the two countries possessed about communism versus democracy. The two dominant nations wanted to spread their ideological government structure all through the world. Due to the aftermath of WWII, the use of the atomic bomb on Japan, and the diverse ideological differences about government structure, the relationship between the US and USSR altered from allies to adversaries. Thus, the beginning of the Cold War and the clash of nuclear proliferation began between two glob al dominant nations. The arms race intensified during diplomatic discussions regarding the Atomic Energy Commission (AEC) because of the fact that the Soviet Union disagreed with the US and UN on the requirements established. The Atomic Energy Commission â€Å"†¦was created in the wake of the U.S. atomic bombing of Japan, the effects of which demonstrated that nuclear energy needed not only to be developed, but controlled. The AEC legally had absolute control over both the development and use of atomic energy† (â€Å"Atomic Energy Commission†). In addition to the AEC, the United Nations created the Baruch Plan that stated that failure to comply with the requirements of the AEC would result in harsh penalties. The Soviet Union, infuriated by the plan, rejected it stating that the US was too far ahead in weapon development (Fuller). To obtain top-secret information the Soviet Union planted a spy, Klaus Fuchs, among the British scientists during the Manhattan Project. Fuchs had been pass ing top-secret information about nuclear bombs to the Soviet Union since 1945 (Etcheson 43). To the US’s surprise, the Soviets established their own atomic bomb in 1949, without any prior indication of testing the bomb (Levine 64). The Soviets launch their first atomic bomb on August 29, 1949. With the Soviets successfully launching their atomic bomb, the battle for arms supremacy began. The US government countered with the development of the hydrogen bomb on November 1, 1952 (Fuller). When the US thought they had developed the strongest weapon in the world, the Soviet Union received more top-secret information about the hydrogen bomb from Fuchs. The Soviets were able to test and produce their hydrogen bomb in late 1955. The USSR launched the first satellite into space by using intercontinental ballistic missile on October 4, 1957 (Roberts). It appeared that the Soviet Union was extremely advanced in space operations and military tactics, and this frightened the US because th e Soviets were able to launch missiles without the use of airplanes (Tirman). The arms race took another turn due to the Sino-Soviet relations in the 1950’s. The US became frightened when it learned China possessed nuclear weapons and had been influenced greatly by the USSR (Tirman). During the 1950s, China, guided by a large number of Soviet advisers, followed the Soviet model of development, with its emphasis on heavy industry funded by surpluses extracted from the peasantry, while making consumer goods a secondary priority (Levine 69). By the late 1950s, however, Mao Zedong had begun to develop new ideas about how China should advance directly to Communism through a mobilization of Chinas massive labor force (Fuller). The USSR and China maintained a strong relation leading up into the 1960’s because of the similar communistic ideologies (â€Å"Sino-Soviet Relations†). With the help of the USSR, China successfully exploded its first atomic bomb October 16, 1961 (Roberts). The havoc and chaos about nuclear proliferation and the spread of communism left the US in position to try and dissolve communism. The US wanted to dissolve the threat of communism due to the lack of government control and the possession of nuclear weapons (Roberts). Many communistic countries were spreading across the world in the 1960’s. With two of the most economic and militaristic countries under the influence of communism, President John F. Kennedy couldn’t let the world be inclined by the idea of communism. The US and Cuba are only 90 miles apart from one another. With the powerful technology of intercontinental ballistic missile able to launch without the use of an airplane, Kennedy invaded Cuba with Operation Bay of Pigs Invasion. Kennedy had the plan to overthrow the Cuban communist leader, Fidel Castro. Castro united with the USSR by trading sugar and other agricultural needs the USSR needed in trade for increased economic and military assistance (Levine 91). The operation failed when Kennedy called off the deployment of the bombers. With the failure of the Bay of Pigs, this left the USSR with world’s opinion of the most dominant nation. On October 15, 1962, the US gained intelligence of the USSR constructing numer ous missile silos off the coast of Cuba, only 90 miles off the coast of Florida (â€Å"Arms Race†). With the US and the USSR being the world’s leaders in nuclear weaponry, the world was petrified of a nuclear holocaust. President Kennedy rather than demanding the USSR to remove the missiles immediately, Kennedy deployed a naval blockade around Cuba to obstruct any USSR missiles from being transported. Suspense and tension with what would happen began to alleviate when Khrushchev sent a letter to Kennedy stating the removal of the silos if the US assured the USSR never to invade Cuba again (Fuller). At the end of the Cuban Missile Crisis, the US and the Soviet Union recognized the concept of building a surplus amount of nuclear warheads could result in a catastrophic disaster on both nations if there was to be a nuclear war. Numerous actions were acquired in various treaties to avert any nuclear disaster to occur. On July 1968, the Treaty on Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons was signed in Washington D.C., Moscow, and London (Roberts). Signed by 130 nations in 1968, the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty went into effect on March 5, 1970 (Fuller). Its goal was to prevent the spread and development of nuclear weaponry. Notably, neither France nor China agreed to sign the treaty, and both countries have continued to develop their nuclear arsenal despite widespread condemnation from around the world (â€Å"Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty†). The most significant treaty was the Strategic Arms Limitation Treaty held in 1972, known as SALT I. President Richard Nixon met with Soviet premier Leonid Brezhnev in Moscow and signed an agreement that provided for a severe limitation on the placement of antiballistic missiles and a freeze on the deployment of intercontinental ballistic missiles by each nation (â€Å"Arms Race†). In 1973, Brezhnev traveled to Washington, D.C., where the leaders agreed never to use nuclear weapons offensively and agreed for a second treaty, known as SALT II. With both nations in a relaxing time with compromises be addressed, this period was a called a dà ©tente (Ungar 109). On June 18, 1979, Carter and Brezhnev signed the SALT II treaty in Vienna. SALT II would have set a limit on long-range missiles that each country could possess and provided for a decrease in these missiles by 1981 (Etcheson 126). Before the Senate could authorize the new treaty, however, the Soviets invaded Afghan istan in December 1979, an act of aggression that heightened U.S. fears in the Cold War (â€Å"Arms Race†). Even with these treaties, the Cold War and the arms race still continued until the election of Reagan and Gorbachev. Both political leaders realized the importance of reduction in nuclear arms (Levine 131). Even though the bombing of Japan ended WWII it was the beginning of the Cold War and the arms race between the US and the USSR, however through billions upon billions of dollars spent on nuclear proliferation the US and the USSR finally maintain a treaty to end the arms race (Fuller). In 1981, Ronald Reagan became president and confirmed his proposal of the reduction of nuclear weaponry. With great coincidence, Mikhail Gorbachev was the leader of the USSR, and he too believed in the reduction of nuclear weaponry (Levine 140). Regan began the funding of the â€Å"Star Wars† plan, which would design a state-of-the-art Anti-Ballistic Missile system that would use satellites to defend the US against missile attacks (Fuller). Finally, the US and the USSR developed a mutual poli tical relationship. The Star Wars plan was aborted after the US spent more than 80 billion dollars without any sufficient progress (Fuller). Reagan had been recognized for his advanced defense measures and his determination to overcome communism with the USSR, brought the USSR slowly crumbing in the late 1980’s. On November 9, 1989, the Berlin Wall collapsed uniting West and East Germany (Etcheson 164). The wall was a long-term symbol of communism. On December 25, 1991, the USSR finally came to halt, when Boris Yeltsin, a strong political figure in Russia rallied up the Russian people to revolt against communism. On that Christmas day, communism and what was called the USSR seized to exist. In the following years, President George W. Bush and Russian president, Vladimir Putin, signed the Treaty of Moscow on May 24, 2002 (â€Å"Arms Race†). The treaty put in place strategic offensive reductions, the most sweeping nuclear arms reductions in history. President Bush said the treaty erased, The last vestiges of the Cold War and forged a new Russian-American partnership (â€Å"Treaty of Moscow†). Wi th long and vigorous tensions between the US and the USSR about nuclear proliferation, communism versus democracy, and the perspective of being the worlds dominate leader, both nations have reconciled and maintained a partnership. Although, the nuclear proliferation between the US and USSR have ended, other countries around the world have obtained possession of weapons of mass destruction that could result into another arms race, or even another World War. Research Papers on The Arms Race, a History of WeaponsAppeasement Policy Towards the Outbreak of World War 2PETSTEL analysis of IndiaAnalysis of Ebay Expanding into AsiaTwilight of the UAWThe Project Managment Office System19 Century Society: A Deeply Divided EraBringing Democracy to AfricaOpen Architechture a white paperDefinition of Export QuotasStandardized Testing

Present Participles in Spanish Known as Gerunds

Present Participles in Spanish Known as Gerunds The Spanish verb form equivalent to -ing verbs in English is known as the present participle or gerund. The gerund always ends in -ando,  iendo, or rarely -yendo. The Spanish gerunds are used much less than the -ing verbs of English, however. Conjugating Spanish Present Participles The Spanish present participle of regular verbs is formed by removing the -ar ending and replacing it with -ando, or by removing the -er or -ir ending and replacing it with -iendo. Here are examples of each of the verb types: hablar (to speak) - hablando (speaking)beber (to drink) - bebiendo (drinking)vivir (to live) - viviendo (living) The verbs that have irregular present participles almost always use the same -ando and -iendo endings, but they have changes in the stems. For example, the present participle of venir (to come) is viniendo (coming), and the present participle of decir (to say) is diciendo (saying). To prevent awkward spellings, a few verbs use a -yendo ending in the participle instead of -iendo. For example, the present participle of leer (to read) is leyendo (reading). Using Gerunds for the Progressive Tenses As a beginning Spanish student, the way you are most likely to use the present participle is with the verb estar (to be) to form what is known as the present progressive tense. Here are some examples of that usage: Estoy estudiando. (I am studying.) Est lavando la ropa. (He is washing the clothing.) Estamos comiendo el desayuno. (We are eating breakfast.)   Here is the present-tense indicative conjugation of estar combined with a sample present participle to form the present progressive tense: yo - Estoy escribiendo. - I am writing.tà º - Ests escribiendo. - You are writing.à ©l, ella, usted - Est escribiendo. - He/she/you is/is/are writing.nosotros, nosotras - Estamos escribiendo. - We are writing.vosotros, vosotras - Estis escribiendo. - You are writing.ellos, ellas, ustedes - Estn escribiendo. - They/you are writing. The same can be done with other tenses and moods. Although it isnt necessary to learn these yet if youre a beginner, here are some examples to demonstrate the concept: Estarà © escribiendo. - I will be writing.Espero que està © escribiendo. - I hope youre writing.Estaba escribiendo. - I/you/he/she was/were writing. The progressive tenses are used less in Spanish than they are in English. As a general rule, they place an emphasis on the continuing nature of the action. For example, the difference between leo and estoy leyendo is roughly the difference between I am reading and I am in the process of reading. (Leo can also mean simply I read, indicating a habitual action.) Present Participles Used Mostly With Other Verbs One of the major differences between the present participles in English and Spanish is that while the English present participle can frequently be used as an adjective or a noun, in Spanish the present participle is nearly always used in conjunction with other verbs. Here are some examples of the present participle in use: Estoy pensando en ti. (I am thinking about you.)Anda buscando el tenedor. (He is walking around looking for the fork.)Sigue estudiando los libros. (She keeps on studying the books.) Haces bien estudiando mucho. (Youre doing well by studying much.) At this stage, you do not need to analyze these sentences or understand the details of how the present participle is used. Note, however, that in all these examples the gerund is used to indicate some form of continuing action, and that it can be translated using an -ing verb (although it doesnt have to be). Cases where you wouldnt use the Spanish participle to translate an -ing verb include instances where the English present participle is used as a noun or adjective. Note these examples: Ver es creer. (Seeing is believing.)Tiene un tigre que come hombres. (She has a man-eating tiger.)Hablar espaà ±ol es divertido. (Speaking Spanish is fun.)Me gusta comer. (I like eating.)Comprà © los zapatos de correr. (I bought the running shoes.) Also note that while in English we can use the present progressive tense to refer to a future event (as in We are leaving tomorrow), that cant be done in Spanish. You must use either the simple present tense (salimos maà ±ana) or a future tense (saldremos maà ±ana or vamos a salir maà ±ana).

Emirates Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 words

Emirates - Essay Example From this research it is clear that presently, Emirates caters to a world-wide market. The primary aim of this study is to examine the current management [practices of Emirates Airlines. To address the aim, the researcher explores the nature of Emirates Airlines business practices and the continuous changes that in give the avion industry in UAE and worldwide. In order to maintain a good performance in the global market and increase the opportunities for expanding its business activities in other country, Emirates Airlines has been successfully analyzing and overcoming its shortcoming or other weaknesses by executing effective strategies. Additionally, to accept the changes in the regional as well as international business environment, it creates an effective and/or flexible management structure which helps the company to maintain sustainable growth. This paper examines the relentless growth of Emirates, and investigates the various strategies that underpin its core competencies, which are responsible for its 20 years of consecutive profitability. The paper establishes that the underlying formula for Emirates’ success is largely attributed to its hub and spoke operation, competitive cost structure and the strong leverage of its brand. Overall these factors are contributing towards the Emirates Airlines' phenomenal growth.